Cabinet Infirmier Guipavas

Overview

  • Founded Date August 12, 1905
  • Sectors Office
  • Posted Jobs 0
  • Viewed 8

Company Description

This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence company that establishes open-source big language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and works as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design offers reactions comparable to other contemporary large language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to limit the capability of these 2 countries to develop advanced AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its very first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share price to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more established rivals has been explained as “overthrowing AI”, [8] constituting “the very first chance at what is becoming a global AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a new age of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative artificial intelligence algorithms, designs, and training information open-source, permitting its code to be easily offered for use, modification, viewing, and developing files for developing functions. [13] The business supposedly intensely hires young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and employs from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ understanding and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading considering that the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative artificial intelligence chatbot open source, suggesting its code is freely available for use, modification, and viewing. This includes consent to gain access to and use the source code, as well as design files, for building functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip constraints on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started an artificial general intelligence lab devoted to research establishing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were hesitant in offering financing as it was not likely that it would have the ability to create an exit in a short time period. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low cost, DeepSeek became understood as the driver for China’s AI design price war. It was rapidly called the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the rate of their AI models to contend with the business. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it was successful compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed prepare for commercialization; [20] this also permits its technology to avoid the most strict provisions of China’s AI guidelines, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to adhere to the federal government’s controls on info. [3]

DeepSeek’s employing preferences target technical capabilities instead of work experience, resulting in a lot of new hires being either current university graduates or developers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the business recruits people with no computer science background to assist its technology comprehend other subjects and understanding locations, consisting of having the ability to generate poetry and perform well on the notoriously tough Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its very first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available for complimentary to both researchers and industrial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license contract (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and responsible downstream use” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction information. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was established to complete with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes greater than many open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the like those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the 2 Base models was also launched concurrently, gotten by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared comparable efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared experts” that are constantly queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They discovered this to help with professional balancing. In standard MoE, some professionals can end up being overly relied on, while other professionals may be hardly ever used, squandering parameters. Attempting to stabilize the professionals so that they are similarly used then causes specialists to duplicate the exact same capability. They proposed the shared specialists to learn core capabilities that are typically utilized, and let the routed experts to find out the peripheral capabilities that are hardly ever used. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math issues and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit model was a process reward design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This benefit model was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math concerns “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit design was continually upgraded during training to avoid reward hacking. This led to the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in two stages. The first phase was trained to solve math and coding issues. This phase utilized 1 reward design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd phase was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage utilized 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and safety reward models were trained on human choice information. The rule-based benefit design was manually configured. All skilled reward models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They selected 2-staged RL, because they found that RL on reasoning data had “special qualities” various from RL on basic data. For instance, RL on reasoning might improve over more training actions. [31]

The two V2-Lite designs were smaller, and skilled similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to assist “further research study and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 designs were substantially modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the basic attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of professionals (MoE) alternative formerly released in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to produce 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline data, then combined with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for math issues was calculated by comparing with the ground-truth label. The benefit for code issues was generated by a benefit design trained to predict whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is basically the exact same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It included a higher ratio of mathematics and programs than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (mathematics, programming, logic) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, basic concern answering) data. Reasoning data was produced by “skilled designs”. Non-reasoning information was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by people. – The “professional models” were trained by beginning with an unspecified base model, then SFT on both information, and synthetic information produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to show and verify during thinking. Then the expert designs were RL using an unspecified reward function.
– Each expert model was trained to generate simply artificial reasoning data in one particular domain (mathematics, programming, logic).
– Expert designs were utilized, rather of R1 itself, given that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor format, and excessive length”.

4. Model-based reward models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference information including both final benefit and chain-of-thought causing the final reward. The reward model produced reward signals for both questions with objective but free-form responses, and concerns without objective answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit models and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was computed for math issues with a last answer (put in a box), and for programming issues by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed extensive low-level engineering to attain efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM routines to build up precisely. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the interaction latency by overlapping extensively calculation and interaction, such as dedicating 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU communication. They decreased communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise device each professional was on in order to prevent specific devices being queried more frequently than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 surpassed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available via DeepSeek’s API, along with through a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek claimed that it exceeded performance of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it used 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a service quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial data created by R1. [47]

A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant initially considers the reasoning procedure in the mind and after that supplies the user with the response. The thinking procedure and answer are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here address here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they used no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, “primarily” of 2 types (other types were not specified): accuracy rewards and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was inspecting whether a boxed response is appropriate (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for programming). Format reward was examining whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to deal with these problems and further improve thinking: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL process as R1-Zero, however also with a “language consistency benefit” to encourage it to react monolingually. This produced an internal design not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking data from the internal model, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the created reasoning had an incorrect final answer, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for reasoning jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable method as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and reactions

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly responds to questions, resolves logic problems and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI business. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes considerably fewer resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to have actually required just about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta spent building its newest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at relatively very little expense has actually been acknowledged as potentially challenging the global dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 model was reportedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s newest designs when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen similarly explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely applauded DeepSeek as a national property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with experts and asked him to offer opinions and suggestions on a draft for remarks of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has actually highlighted potential limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export limitations on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models consequently “stimulated market turmoil” [57] and caused shares in significant global innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech companies likewise sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had caused tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of worth was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very outstanding”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed uncertainty of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its . [60] [66] [67] Various business, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to use the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to contact number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack interfered with the appropriate performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the main application programming user interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers found in China, uses censorship mechanisms for topics that are thought about politically sensitive for the federal government of China. For instance, the model refuses to address questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first create an answer, however then deletes it soon afterwards and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship mechanisms and limitations can just be eliminated to a minimal extent in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist worths” defined by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are ended. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and specified: “We securely oppose any kind of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are dedicated to achieving the complete reunification of the motherland through peaceful ways.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to deceive DeepSeek into offering certain responses to a few of these topics by asking for in its response to switch particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some professionals fear that the government of China could use the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy conditions say “We save the information we gather in safe servers located in the People’s Republic of China … We may gather your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you offer to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy is constant with ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security issues. [80] In response, the Italian information defense authority is seeking extra information on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal information, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had started a national security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned making use of DeepSeek at government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s usage of individual info. [83]

Expert system industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required picking “Deep Think allowed”, and every user could utilize it only 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s inexpensive, open AI design DeepSeek delights scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper designs and weaker chips call into question trillions in AI facilities spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia examination signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you ought to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to drop?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI design got rid of US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design outperforms Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outshines Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI design seems among the very best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first thinking model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik minute”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese firm reveals AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek poses a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI design breakthrough highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot sparks US market turmoil, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “incredibly excellent”: “We need to take the advancements out of China very, very seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “positive””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends massive Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek momentarily limited new sign-ups, citing ‘massive harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it does not appreciate complimentary speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We tried DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a global AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of turmoil”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI presents powerful cyber, information personal privacy hazards”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts prompt caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on information defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines result of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.

Scroll to Top