Overview

  • Founded Date July 23, 1926
  • Sectors Office
  • Posted Jobs 0
  • Viewed 7

Company Description

This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system company that establishes open-source big language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and functions as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model provides reactions similar to other modern large language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a considerably lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to limit the capability of these 2 countries to develop advanced AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share price to stop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more recognized competitors has actually been explained as “upending AI”, [8] making up “the very first shot at what is becoming a worldwide AI area race”, [11] and introducing “a brand-new age of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative synthetic intelligence algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, permitting its code to be easily offered for usage, adjustment, viewing, and creating documents for constructing purposes. [13] The company supposedly strongly hires young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading considering that the 2007-2008 financial crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on developing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, meaning its code is easily available for use, modification, and viewing. This includes approval to access and use the source code, along with style files, for building functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip restrictions on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer began an artificial basic intelligence lab dedicated to research developing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital firms were reluctant in providing financing as it was unlikely that it would be able to generate an exit in a short period of time. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong efficiency for a low price, DeepSeek ended up being understood as the driver for China’s AI model cost war. It was rapidly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the cost of their AI designs to complete with the company. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research study and has no detailed strategies for commercialization; [20] this also enables its technology to avoid the most stringent provisions of China’s AI guidelines, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to adhere to the government’s controls on info. [3]

DeepSeek’s employing preferences target technical abilities instead of work experience, leading to a lot of brand-new hires being either current university graduates or designers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company recruits individuals with no computer science background to help its technology comprehend other topics and understanding areas, consisting of being able to produce poetry and perform well on the infamously hard Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available for complimentary to both scientists and commercial users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and accountable downstream use” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline data. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was launched). It was established to take on other LLMs available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark results higher than many open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the 2 Base models was likewise launched concurrently, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed similar efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared experts” that are constantly queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They found this to aid with expert balancing. In basic MoE, some specialists can end up being overly counted on, while other specialists might be rarely utilized, wasting specifications. Attempting to stabilize the professionals so that they are similarly used then causes experts to replicate the exact same capacity. They proposed the shared specialists to discover core capabilities that are typically utilized, and let the routed specialists to find out the peripheral capacities that are seldom utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K mathematics problems and their tool-use-integrated detailed solutions. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit model was a procedure benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd technique. [30] This reward model was then utilized to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math concerns “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward design was continuously upgraded during training to prevent benefit hacking. This led to the RL design.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two larger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 phases. The very first phase was trained to solve mathematics and coding issues. This phase utilized 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The second phase was trained to be valuable, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage used 3 benefit designs. The helpfulness and security reward models were trained on human choice data. The rule-based benefit model was manually programmed. All skilled benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They selected 2-staged RL, because they found that RL on reasoning information had “distinct characteristics” different from RL on basic data. For instance, RL on thinking could enhance over more training steps. [31]

The two V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and qualified similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research study and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 designs were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and used the mix of experts (MoE) variant formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then integrated with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics issues was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code problems was created by a reward model trained to forecast whether a program would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is essentially the very same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It consisted of a greater ratio of mathematics and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of thinking (math, programs, logic) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, basic concern answering) data. Reasoning data was produced by “expert designs”. Non-reasoning information was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by people. – The “professional models” were trained by beginning with an undefined base design, then SFT on both data, and synthetic data created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to show and confirm during thinking. Then the professional designs were RL utilizing an undefined reward function.
– Each specialist model was trained to produce just synthetic reasoning information in one specific domain (math, shows, logic).
– Expert models were utilized, instead of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad format, and excessive length”.

4. Model-based benefit models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice information consisting of both last reward and chain-of-thought leading to the last reward. The benefit design produced benefit signals for both questions with unbiased however free-form answers, and questions without unbiased responses (such as imaginative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both reward models and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was computed for math problems with a final answer (put in a box), and for programming issues by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed substantial low-level engineering to achieve efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the basic 32-bit, requiring special GEMM routines to build up precisely. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the communication latency by overlapping extensively computation and interaction, such as dedicating 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU communication. They lowered interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact device each expert was on in order to prevent particular devices being queried more typically than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available by means of DeepSeek’s API, as well as through a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for rational reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond efficiency of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached an option faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by R1. [47]

A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant initially thinks of the thinking procedure in the mind and after that offers the user with the answer. The reasoning procedure and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here answer here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based benefit. All benefit functions were rule-based, “primarily” of two types (other types were not defined): accuracy benefits and format rewards. Accuracy benefit was examining whether a boxed response is proper (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was checking whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to resolve these problems and more improve reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but also with a “language consistency reward” to encourage it to react monolingually. This produced an internal design not released.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal design, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the produced reasoning had an incorrect last response, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800 data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for thinking tasks) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar method as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently responds to questions, fixes logic problems and writes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes significantly less resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require just about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested constructing its newest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at reasonably very little expense has actually been acknowledged as potentially challenging the international dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was reportedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s newest models when utilized for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley endeavor capitalist Marc Andreessen similarly explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely applauded DeepSeek as a national possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to offer opinions and recommendations on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of minimal resources has actually highlighted potential limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, that include export constraints on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI designs consequently “triggered market turmoil” [57] and caused shares in major worldwide innovation companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 model, had actually led to record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “extremely impressive”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed apprehension of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its brand-new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interrupted the appropriate performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the official application shows user interface (API) version of R1, which ranges from servers located in China, utilizes censorship mechanisms for topics that are considered politically delicate for the federal government of China. For instance, the design declines to answer concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially generate a response, however then deletes it quickly later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my existing scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The integrated censorship mechanisms and restrictions can just be gotten rid of to a limited degree in the open-source version of the R1 design. If the “core socialist worths” defined by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are terminated. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and stated: “We strongly oppose any form of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are dedicated to accomplishing the total reunification of the motherland through tranquil ways.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to deceive DeepSeek into offering particular responses to some of these subjects by asking for in its response to swap specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and privacy

Some experts fear that the government of China could use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms say “We save the info we gather in safe and secure servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We may gather your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you offer to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security concerns. [80] In reaction, the Italian information defense authority is looking for extra details on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal information, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had actually begun a national security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned using DeepSeek at government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s use of personal info. [83]

Expert system industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed picking “Deep Think allowed”, and every user might utilize it only 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI design DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s more affordable designs and weaker chips call into question trillions in AI facilities costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to plunge?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI model conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design surpasses Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outshines Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design seems among the very best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first reasoning design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik minute”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek poses a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI model development highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market turmoil, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates worldwide AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “super remarkable”: “We must take the developments out of China extremely, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily limited brand-new sign-ups, pointing out ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it does not appreciate free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We attempted out DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on an international AI race: geopolitics, development and the increase of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI presents powerful cyber, data personal privacy threats”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a huge TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House assesses impact of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.

Scroll to Top