
Rabbittec
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date May 31, 1911
-
Sectors Office
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 7
Company Description
This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system company that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and functions as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 design provides reactions comparable to other modern big language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a similar LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were developed in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to restrict the ability of these two countries to develop advanced AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its very first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share rate to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus bigger and more recognized rivals has been described as “upending AI”, [8] making up “the very first shot at what is emerging as an international AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative artificial intelligence algorithms, models, and training information open-source, allowing its code to be freely readily available for usage, modification, viewing, and creating documents for developing purposes. [13] The business reportedly vigorously recruits young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and employs from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ understanding and capabilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading given that the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, implying its code is freely readily available for use, adjustment, and watching. This consists of consent to gain access to and utilize the source code, along with style files, for building functions. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had built up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip limitations on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic basic intelligence lab dedicated to research study establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms hesitated in providing funding as it was not likely that it would have the ability to generate an exit in a brief time period. [15]
After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong efficiency for a low cost, DeepSeek became known as the catalyst for China’s AI model cost war. It was rapidly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the price of their AI models to contend with the company. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it was profitable compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]
DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed prepare for commercialization; [20] this also enables its technology to prevent the most rigid provisions of China’s AI regulations, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to adhere to the federal government’s controls on info. [3]
DeepSeek’s employing choices target technical capabilities instead of work experience, leading to many brand-new hires being either current university graduates or developers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the business recruits people with no computer technology background to assist its innovation comprehend other subjects and knowledge areas, including having the ability to produce poetry and perform well on the notoriously hard Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its very first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available totally free to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and accountable downstream use” for the design itself. [21]
They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series includes 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction data. This produced the Instruct designs.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat types (no Instruct was launched). It was established to take on other LLMs available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark results higher than the majority of open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]
The architecture was basically the same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat variations of the two Base models was likewise launched simultaneously, gotten by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the very same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared comparable efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a version of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared experts” that are always queried, and “routed professionals” that might not be. They found this to aid with skilled balancing. In standard MoE, some specialists can become extremely depended on, while other professionals may be seldom utilized, losing specifications. Attempting to balance the experts so that they are equally used then triggers specialists to reproduce the very same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to find out core capabilities that are frequently used, and let the routed specialists to learn the peripheral capacities that are seldom utilized. [28]
In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit model was a process benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This benefit model was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit model was continuously upgraded throughout training to prevent reward hacking. This resulted in the RL model.
V2
In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two bigger models were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 phases. The first stage was trained to resolve math and coding problems. This stage utilized 1 benefit design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The 2nd stage was trained to be practical, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage utilized 3 benefit designs. The helpfulness and security reward models were trained on human preference information. The rule-based reward model was manually configured. All trained reward models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They chose 2-staged RL, due to the fact that they found that RL on reasoning information had “unique qualities” various from RL on basic information. For instance, RL on thinking might enhance over more training actions. [31]
The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and qualified similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to help “further research study and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 models were substantially customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the basic attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of experts (MoE) variant previously published in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related direction data, then integrated with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics problems was computed by comparing with the ground-truth label. The benefit for code issues was produced by a benefit model trained to forecast whether a program would pass the system tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is essentially the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mainly English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of mathematics and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of thinking (math, programs, reasoning) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, simple concern answering) information. Reasoning information was generated by “professional models”. Non-reasoning information was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by people. – The “skilled models” were trained by beginning with an undefined base design, then SFT on both data, and artificial information created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and verify during thinking. Then the specialist models were RL using an unspecified benefit function.
– Each specialist model was trained to generate just synthetic thinking data in one particular domain (mathematics, programs, logic).
– Expert designs were utilized, rather of R1 itself, since the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor formatting, and excessive length”.
4. Model-based benefit models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference data consisting of both last benefit and chain-of-thought causing the last benefit. The benefit design produced benefit signals for both questions with unbiased however free-form responses, and concerns without objective responses (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both reward models and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was calculated for math issues with a final answer (put in a box), and for programming problems by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek team carried out extensive low-level engineering to attain effectiveness. They used mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the basic 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM regimens to collect properly. They used a customized 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the communication latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and interaction, such as dedicating 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU communication. They decreased interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific maker each expert was on in order to prevent specific makers being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]
After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 surpassed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became available via DeepSeek’s API, as well as by means of a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek declared that it surpassed efficiency of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it utilized 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a service much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information produced by R1. [47]
A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant solves it. The assistant initially believes about the reasoning procedure in the mind and after that supplies the user with the answer. The reasoning process and response are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning procedure here address here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based reward. All benefit functions were rule-based, “primarily” of 2 types (other types were not defined): accuracy benefits and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was examining whether a boxed answer is appropriate (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was checking whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has concerns with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to address these problems and additional improve thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL process as R1-Zero, but likewise with a “language consistency reward” to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal design not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning information from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the generated thinking had a wrong last answer, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning jobs) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K data manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and responses
DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently responds to concerns, solves logic problems and writes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI business. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 uses considerably fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as many as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to have actually required only about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta spent building its latest AI technology. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly very little cost has been acknowledged as possibly challenging the worldwide dominance of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was supposedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s most current designs when used for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen also described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]
DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely applauded DeepSeek as a national possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to supply opinions and tips on a draft for comments of the yearly 2024 government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted potential limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, which consist of export limitations on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI designs consequently “triggered market chaos” [57] and triggered shares in significant worldwide technology business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] An international selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 design, had caused tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was cleaned off American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very outstanding”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed suspicion of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to use the model in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack disrupted the proper functioning of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have actually observed that the official application programs interface (API) version of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, uses censorship mechanisms for subjects that are thought about politically delicate for the government of China. For instance, the model declines to address concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first create an answer, but then deletes it shortly later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship systems and limitations can only be eliminated to a restricted level in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist worths” defined by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are terminated. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and mentioned: “We strongly oppose any type of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are devoted to achieving the complete reunification of the motherland through serene methods.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the to deceive DeepSeek into giving particular answers to some of these subjects by requesting in its response to swap certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and personal privacy
Some professionals fear that the government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms state “We save the info we collect in protected servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you offer to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy is consistent with ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security issues. [80] In response, the Italian data protection authority is looking for additional information on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal information, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had begun a national security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned making use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s usage of individual information. [83]
Expert system market in China.
Notes
^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed choosing “Deep Think enabled”, and every user might utilize it just 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI model DeepSeek thrills researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world ready to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s more affordable designs and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI infrastructure spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia examination signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you must understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI design conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model surpasses Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outshines Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI design appears to be among the very best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek poses a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI design advancement highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market turmoil, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers worldwide AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “incredibly excellent”: “We must take the advancements out of China really, very seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘impressive'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, including Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly restricted new sign-ups, citing ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t appreciate complimentary speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI postures powerful cyber, data privacy risks”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts prompt care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a huge TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator looks for details from DeepSeek on information security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House assesses result of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, authorities says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.